Search the Legal Services & Corporate Governance desk archive.
New EU AI Act guidance is set to sharpen due-diligence obligations for law firms that use generative AI tools. Firms deploying such systems will face added documentation requirements and fresh questions about what they must disclose to clients. The guidance also narrows how high-risk use is defined in legal services, making it important for practitioners to reassess their AI governance and compliance frameworks.
A legal commentary examines the use of AI connectors in e-discovery, noting that while these tools offer real utility, they come with important constraints. A central concern is that employees often fail to grasp that information they enter into assistants such as Claude may become discoverable in litigation. The piece urges legal and compliance teams to set clear guardrails and educate staff before adoption outpaces awareness of these risks.
Efforts by the judiciary to establish formal rules governing artificial intelligence use in the courts have stalled, with doubts about whether the relevant parties can reach consensus cited as a central obstacle. The impasse leaves courts without settled guidance on how AI tools may be used at a time when judges, court staff and litigants are increasingly encountering them in daily work. For legal professionals, the delay translates into continued uncertainty over acceptable use, disclosure and oversight standards.
A federal appellate court has rejected an argument that a law firm’s use of artificial intelligence should reduce a $115,000 attorneys’ fee award. According to a Reuters report Monday, the court declined to slash the award over the firm’s AI use. The ruling matters because it indicates that AI use alone may not be treated as grounds for cutting fees in legal work.
A proposed New Jersey bill, A5607, would make artificial intelligence chatbot providers subject to the state’s product liability laws, allowing consumers to hold them liable. The legislation could increase legal exposure for chatbot developers and set a state-level precedent for AI accountability.
{mag_summary} Researchers are warning that cyberattacks using agentic artificial intelligence on law firms and other groups in the legal profession are on the rise. These…
A new survey shows that law firm partners in Silicon Valley now earn more on average than their New York counterparts, a reversal that may reflect the AI-driven boom in the technology sector. The shift matters because partner pay is a signal of where legal demand and client spending power are strongest. It could also affect how firms recruit, retain, and price senior talent in key markets.