Search the Legal Services & Corporate Governance desk archive.
A Delaware court has issued an opinion that draws a sharper distinction between good-faith board oversight and process failures in merger-related disputes. For deal counsel, the ruling works as a clearer checklist covering how board minutes and advisor records should be kept. The practical takeaway is that documentation quality may matter as much as the substance of the board's decisions when oversight is challenged.
The New Mexico Supreme Court has permanently disbarred a prosecutor, acting after hearing from a disciplinary board that had examined the attorney's conduct. The court's order followed findings that the prosecutor displayed a pattern of misconduct. Permanent disbarment is the most severe professional sanction available, effectively ending the lawyer's ability to practice in the state. For prosecutors, the outcome signals that ethics violations tied to public office can carry career-ending consequences.
Above the Law ran a reader caption contest built around a pun on Weil and a hypothetical merger partner described as a ghost. The post leans on the "white shoe to boo" wordplay, turning law firm merger chatter into a Halloween-flavored joke rather than reporting actual deal news. For professional readers, it's a light item reflecting how closely the legal industry watches Big Law combination rumors, with the humor resting on the idea that Weil's prospects with such a partner remain slim.
Democrats have previously pressed for answers about Biglaw firms’ dealings with Trump, and after the midterms they are positioned to pursue those questions through congressional oversight. The article warns firms that accommodated Trump to prepare for probes. For professional readers, the scrutiny could heighten reputational and political risk around law firms’ Trump-related work.